Hillary Clinton Defends Kimmel, Downplays Left-Wing Rhetoric Behind Kirk Assassination

Twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is once again positioning herself as a defender of “free speech,” but only when it serves her political allies. In a CNN interview with Fareed Zakaria, Clinton criticized the suspension of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, calling it “a very clear example of using the power of the state to suppress speech,” despite Kimmel’s remarks coming just days after the assassination of conservative leader Charlie Kirk.

Kimmel, who mocked Kirk’s murder as if it were a joke about a child’s pet, faced backlash and eventual suspension after public outrage and pressure on affiliates. Yet Clinton framed his suspension as a First Amendment crisis, lamenting that the government “intimidated” corporations into silencing dissent. What she failed to acknowledge is that Kimmel’s comments weren’t satire—they were flippant mockery of a political murder, aired to millions during a time of national mourning.

Clinton claimed she had no idea, during her time in public life, that she could have called the FCC to remove critics from the air. This is rich coming from the exact figure who, in a 2015 debate, named Republicans among her proudest enemies and spent years pushing narratives aimed at discrediting political opponents through the media and legal system.

While Clinton insists “we defend free speech in terrible times,” her silence has been deafening when it comes to the unrelenting demonization of conservatives in media, education, and pop culture. This toxic climate played no small part in Kirk’s death. That’s not speculation. Authorities confirmed that Kirk’s killer, 22-year-old Thomas Robinson, had expressed hatred for conservatives and Christians and left a message on the bullet casings reading, “Hey fascist! Catch!”

Yet when teachers, Democrat officials, and media pundits openly celebrated Kirk’s assassination, Hillary Clinton said nothing. Her only visible activity related to the tragedy was a congratulatory tweet to a union boss whose book compared conservatives to Nazis. That’s not free speech—it’s a signal.

Kimmel wasn’t suspended for telling a joke—he was suspended for crossing a line, and networks responded to a public demanding accountability. The FCC reminded broadcasters of their legal responsibilities. That’s not censorship. That’s a consequence.

Meanwhile, Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX) and other Republicans have been clear: the left has spent over a decade dehumanizing conservatives, and now political violence is becoming part of the result. The murder of Charlie Kirk wasn’t a punchline—it was a warning.

Clinton and others now suddenly care about speech only when it’s their side being silenced, while conservative voices have faced relentless censorship, smears, and actual threats. The double standard is obvious, and voters are starting to see through the performative outrage.

Twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is once again positioning herself as a defender of “free speech,” but only when it serves her political allies. In a CNN interview with Fareed Zakaria, Clinton criticized the suspension of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, calling it “a very clear example of using the power of the state to suppress speech,” despite Kimmel’s remarks coming just days after the assassination of conservative leader Charlie Kirk.

Kimmel, who mocked Kirk’s murder as if it were a joke about a child’s pet, faced backlash and eventual suspension after public outrage and pressure on affiliates. Yet Clinton framed his suspension as a First Amendment crisis, lamenting that the government “intimidated” corporations into silencing dissent. What she failed to acknowledge is that Kimmel’s comments weren’t satire—they were flippant mockery of a political murder, aired to millions during a time of national mourning.

Clinton claimed she had no idea, during her time in public life, that she could have called the FCC to remove critics from the air. This is rich coming from the exact figure who, in a 2015 debate, named Republicans among her proudest enemies and spent years pushing narratives aimed at discrediting political opponents through the media and legal system.

While Clinton insists “we defend free speech in terrible times,” her silence has been deafening when it comes to the unrelenting demonization of conservatives in media, education, and pop culture. This toxic climate played no small part in Kirk’s death. That’s not speculation. Authorities confirmed that Kirk’s killer, 22-year-old Thomas Robinson, had expressed hatred for conservatives and Christians and left a message on the bullet casings reading, “Hey fascist! Catch!”

Yet when teachers, Democrat officials, and media pundits openly celebrated Kirk’s assassination, Hillary Clinton said nothing. Her only visible activity related to the tragedy was a congratulatory tweet to a union boss whose book compared conservatives to Nazis. That’s not free speech—it’s a signal.

Kimmel wasn’t suspended for telling a joke—he was suspended for crossing a line, and networks responded to a public demanding accountability. The FCC reminded broadcasters of their legal responsibilities. That’s not censorship. That’s a consequence.

Meanwhile, Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX) and other Republicans have been clear: the left has spent over a decade dehumanizing conservatives, and now political violence is becoming part of the result. The murder of Charlie Kirk wasn’t a punchline—it was a warning.

Clinton and others now suddenly care about speech only when it’s their side being silenced, while conservative voices have faced relentless censorship, smears, and actual threats. The double standard is obvious, and voters are starting to see through the performative outrage.