Appeals Court Hands Trump a Victory Over National Guard Deployment in DC

An appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled Wednesday unanimously that the National Guard may remain stationed in the capital while the judges examine the legality of the deployment.

The three-judge panel includes Judges Gregory G. Katsas and Neomi J. Rao, both Trump appointees, and Patricia A. Millett, an Obama appointee. Judge Millet authored the opinion.

In their 30-page opinion, they also noted that the Trump administration is likely to win the case simply because Washington, D.C., has a unique legal status. 

“Because the District of Columbia is a federal district created by Congress, rather than a constitutionally sovereign entity like the 50 states,” the panel wrote, “the defendants appear on this early record likely to prevail on the merits of their argument that the president possesses a unique power within the District — the seat of the federal government — to mobilize the Guard.”

President Trump deployed the National Guard to the capital in August, in an effort to bring down the city’s crime rates and help with immigration enforcement. In November,  U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb ruled that Trump had overstepped his legal authority.

In August 2025, about 2,000–2,300 National Guard troops were deployed to Washington, D.C.; by December 2025, that number had risen to roughly 2,300–3,200. 

While Democrats accused President Trump of authoritarianism for deploying federal troops, even Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser was forced to acknowledge that the forces helped reduce crime, as the city went a whole two-week period without a single murder for the first time in recorded history.

Editor’s Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump’s agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump’s mandate for change. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

An appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled Wednesday unanimously that the National Guard may remain stationed in the capital while the judges examine the legality of the deployment.

The three-judge panel includes Judges Gregory G. Katsas and Neomi J. Rao, both Trump appointees, and Patricia A. Millett, an Obama appointee. Judge Millet authored the opinion.

In their 30-page opinion, they also noted that the Trump administration is likely to win the case simply because Washington, D.C., has a unique legal status. 

“Because the District of Columbia is a federal district created by Congress, rather than a constitutionally sovereign entity like the 50 states,” the panel wrote, “the defendants appear on this early record likely to prevail on the merits of their argument that the president possesses a unique power within the District — the seat of the federal government — to mobilize the Guard.”

President Trump deployed the National Guard to the capital in August, in an effort to bring down the city’s crime rates and help with immigration enforcement. In November,  U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb ruled that Trump had overstepped his legal authority.

In August 2025, about 2,000–2,300 National Guard troops were deployed to Washington, D.C.; by December 2025, that number had risen to roughly 2,300–3,200. 

While Democrats accused President Trump of authoritarianism for deploying federal troops, even Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser was forced to acknowledge that the forces helped reduce crime, as the city went a whole two-week period without a single murder for the first time in recorded history.

Editor’s Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump’s agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump’s mandate for change. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.