The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump’s Desk for Signature

Washington, D.C. — After relentless pressure from President Trump, conservative activists, and millions of Americans demanding secure elections, the House finally scraped together 218 votes Wednesday to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act. The margin? Just five votes. 

This key piece of legislation is commonsensical and innocuous, yet Democrats put up a fight to prevent these baseline guardrails from being instituted. The SAVE Act would require voters to present some form of identification when registering to vote—whether a government-issued ID, passport, or birth certificate. Additionally, it would clean up voter registration rolls by removing any non-citizens from the rolls. But that shouldn’t be an issue, right?  

Though presenting an ID to vote seems like a no-brainer, as we are required to show identification just about everywhere else in American life, putting it into practice is another story. The SAVE Act would not have reached the Senate floor without the tireless work of Republican Study Committee members, Scott Presler, and grassroots conservatives who refused to let this issue die. 

RSC Chairman August Pfluger had this to say about the matter: “The American people did not give Republicans a mandate to make excuses. They gave us one to deliver wins, and the SAVE America Act is exactly that. Every single Democrat who voted no today proved they would rather let illegal aliens tip the scales in our national elections than protect your vote. Your vote is sacred, and House Republicans have now delivered on our promise to secure it twice. The Senate must get this to President Trump’s desk without further delay. The American people are watching, and they are done waiting.” 

Thank heavens someone in Congress understands this. Luckily, Scott Presler has been a crucial asset in communicating to Congress exactly what his 5 million followers are asking for, and what voters are expecting from this 119th Congress. 

Presler is the founder of the PAC Early Vote Action, which focuses on registering new Republican voters. He’s been instrumental in dozens of local, state, and national elections, traveling the country to train volunteers on canvassing and voter registration. 

Now he’s taken that organizing muscle straight to Washington. Voters demanded secure elections, so Presler delivered their message personally—lobbying lawmakers, doing the media rounds, and mobilizing his 5 million followers to hold Congress accountable. 

Here’s what should concern every American. Not a single Democrat following this Republican Study Committee presser could articulate why requiring an ID to vote is somehow voter suppression, yet requiring ID to buy cold medicine, board a plane, or pick up concert tickets is perfectly fine. The logic does not track—unless the quiet part is meant to stay quiet.

When you need an ID to VOTE on Voter Integrity Legislation, but claim requiring one to vote in elections is discriminatory, you’re not looking at principle. You’re looking at political calculation.  

What Happens Next 

The SAVE Act will now head to a Senate that’s already showing reluctance to touch anything the legacy media might label “controversial,” which, in the Trump era, is everything. But the reality is: this isn’t controversial. Polling consistently shows that Americans—including a majority of Democrats—support voter ID requirements. These numbers are extraordinarily bipartisan, even if the politicians can’t seem to figure that out. 

President Trump has made clear he’ll sign it the moment it reaches his desk. The question is whether Senate Republicans will find the backbone to push it through, or whether they’ll let it languish while consultants whisper about “optics” and “suburban moderates.” 

Requiring ID to vote shouldn’t be a heavy lift. It shouldn’t require activist pressure, media campaigns, or narrow House votes. It should be automatic. The kind of basic election integrity measure that every functional democracy takes for granted. 

The aggressive pushback against these commonsense guardrails tells you everything you need to know about who benefits from the current system and who’s afraid of accountability. 

With the help of the Republican Study Committee, Scott Pressler, and a voter base that demands action, 218 elected officials did their jobs. Now it’s the Senate’s turn. And if they can’t get this across the finish line, voters will remember who stood in the way when it’s time to register—with ID, of course—for the next election.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Washington, D.C. — After relentless pressure from President Trump, conservative activists, and millions of Americans demanding secure elections, the House finally scraped together 218 votes Wednesday to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act. The margin? Just five votes. 

This key piece of legislation is commonsensical and innocuous, yet Democrats put up a fight to prevent these baseline guardrails from being instituted. The SAVE Act would require voters to present some form of identification when registering to vote—whether a government-issued ID, passport, or birth certificate. Additionally, it would clean up voter registration rolls by removing any non-citizens from the rolls. But that shouldn’t be an issue, right?  

Though presenting an ID to vote seems like a no-brainer, as we are required to show identification just about everywhere else in American life, putting it into practice is another story. The SAVE Act would not have reached the Senate floor without the tireless work of Republican Study Committee members, Scott Presler, and grassroots conservatives who refused to let this issue die. 

RSC Chairman August Pfluger had this to say about the matter: “The American people did not give Republicans a mandate to make excuses. They gave us one to deliver wins, and the SAVE America Act is exactly that. Every single Democrat who voted no today proved they would rather let illegal aliens tip the scales in our national elections than protect your vote. Your vote is sacred, and House Republicans have now delivered on our promise to secure it twice. The Senate must get this to President Trump’s desk without further delay. The American people are watching, and they are done waiting.” 

Thank heavens someone in Congress understands this. Luckily, Scott Presler has been a crucial asset in communicating to Congress exactly what his 5 million followers are asking for, and what voters are expecting from this 119th Congress. 

Presler is the founder of the PAC Early Vote Action, which focuses on registering new Republican voters. He’s been instrumental in dozens of local, state, and national elections, traveling the country to train volunteers on canvassing and voter registration. 

Now he’s taken that organizing muscle straight to Washington. Voters demanded secure elections, so Presler delivered their message personally—lobbying lawmakers, doing the media rounds, and mobilizing his 5 million followers to hold Congress accountable. 

Here’s what should concern every American. Not a single Democrat following this Republican Study Committee presser could articulate why requiring an ID to vote is somehow voter suppression, yet requiring ID to buy cold medicine, board a plane, or pick up concert tickets is perfectly fine. The logic does not track—unless the quiet part is meant to stay quiet.

When you need an ID to VOTE on Voter Integrity Legislation, but claim requiring one to vote in elections is discriminatory, you’re not looking at principle. You’re looking at political calculation.  

What Happens Next 

The SAVE Act will now head to a Senate that’s already showing reluctance to touch anything the legacy media might label “controversial,” which, in the Trump era, is everything. But the reality is: this isn’t controversial. Polling consistently shows that Americans—including a majority of Democrats—support voter ID requirements. These numbers are extraordinarily bipartisan, even if the politicians can’t seem to figure that out. 

President Trump has made clear he’ll sign it the moment it reaches his desk. The question is whether Senate Republicans will find the backbone to push it through, or whether they’ll let it languish while consultants whisper about “optics” and “suburban moderates.” 

Requiring ID to vote shouldn’t be a heavy lift. It shouldn’t require activist pressure, media campaigns, or narrow House votes. It should be automatic. The kind of basic election integrity measure that every functional democracy takes for granted. 

The aggressive pushback against these commonsense guardrails tells you everything you need to know about who benefits from the current system and who’s afraid of accountability. 

With the help of the Republican Study Committee, Scott Pressler, and a voter base that demands action, 218 elected officials did their jobs. Now it’s the Senate’s turn. And if they can’t get this across the finish line, voters will remember who stood in the way when it’s time to register—with ID, of course—for the next election.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.